<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Bing &#8211; Careless or Stupid?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/</link>
	<description>I think you are lost...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:56:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark K</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-16999</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-16999</guid>
		<description>Stupid Bing - Trying to impress us with their fact checking

Engineering Wonders: The Roman Coliseum at El Djem

http://www.bing.com/featured/content/search?q=Engineering+Wonders%3a+The+Roman+Coliseum+at+El+Djem&amp;FORM=RQHOME

Bing&#039;s Fact:
The Roman coliseum at El Djem, Tunisia in northern Africa was built nearly 1,700 centuries ago...

1700 centuries = 170,000 years

Roman Kingdom founded 2,763 years ago
Roman Republic founded 2,519 years ago
Roman Empire founded 2,011 years ago

Wooly Mammoths and Neanderthal Man lived 29,000 to 230,000 years ago

So the Roman coliseum at El Djem, Tunisia was built 167,237 years before anything Roman or anything else in Tunisia.  The cavemen must of used the mammoth&#039;s to drag the stones around.  Amazing how they were able to build such a beaitful structure using such primitive tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid Bing &#8211; Trying to impress us with their fact checking</p>
<p>Engineering Wonders: The Roman Coliseum at El Djem</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bing.com/featured/content/search?q=Engineering+Wonders%3a+The+Roman+Coliseum+at+El+Djem&amp;FORM=RQHOME" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/featured/content/search?q=Engineering+Wonders%3a+The+Roman+Coliseum+at+El+Djem&amp;FORM=RQHOME</a></p>
<p>Bing&#8217;s Fact:<br />
The Roman coliseum at El Djem, Tunisia in northern Africa was built nearly 1,700 centuries ago&#8230;</p>
<p>1700 centuries = 170,000 years</p>
<p>Roman Kingdom founded 2,763 years ago<br />
Roman Republic founded 2,519 years ago<br />
Roman Empire founded 2,011 years ago</p>
<p>Wooly Mammoths and Neanderthal Man lived 29,000 to 230,000 years ago</p>
<p>So the Roman coliseum at El Djem, Tunisia was built 167,237 years before anything Roman or anything else in Tunisia.  The cavemen must of used the mammoth&#8217;s to drag the stones around.  Amazing how they were able to build such a beaitful structure using such primitive tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lacey Cook</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-14987</link>
		<dc:creator>Lacey Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 19:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-14987</guid>
		<description>It is interesting to compare the performance of  Bing and Google search but i haven&#039;t seen any difference at all in their performance.   .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to compare the performance of  Bing and Google search but i haven&#8217;t seen any difference at all in their performance.   .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-14770</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-14770</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m sorry, but i&#039;ve given bing a couple of days now.  and typically microsoft, it&#039;s not what it says on the tin.  with around 50% of searches i get the EXACT same results as google, not &#039;more relavent&#039; results.  with the other 50% i get i would honestly say &#039;less relavent&#039; results.  and the picture behind the whole page makes it load slowly on anything but my fast broadband at home.  back to google me thinks, sorry microsoft.  how about stop making game consoles (that don&#039;t work) and search engines (that don&#039;t work like you say it does) and concentrate more on your &#039;bread &amp; butter&#039; - windows.  then maybe we&#039;ll get a proper good OS for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m sorry, but i&#8217;ve given bing a couple of days now.  and typically microsoft, it&#8217;s not what it says on the tin.  with around 50% of searches i get the EXACT same results as google, not &#8216;more relavent&#8217; results.  with the other 50% i get i would honestly say &#8216;less relavent&#8217; results.  and the picture behind the whole page makes it load slowly on anything but my fast broadband at home.  back to google me thinks, sorry microsoft.  how about stop making game consoles (that don&#8217;t work) and search engines (that don&#8217;t work like you say it does) and concentrate more on your &#8216;bread &amp; butter&#8217; &#8211; windows.  then maybe we&#8217;ll get a proper good OS for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly Martin</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-14691</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-14691</guid>
		<description>I use Bing and Google whenever i want to find something on the internet. I think that both search engines are very good.         `</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Bing and Google whenever i want to find something on the internet. I think that both search engines are very good.         `</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ram</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-13641</link>
		<dc:creator>ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 19:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-13641</guid>
		<description>www.bing.com i am sorry 2 say that u r a fucker and a big and bad weight on net plz close this fucker bing.u fool dont u understand that v the public need a good responce.hope u understood.
                                         yours bad record vitness
                                                                    mrs ram sharma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com</a> i am sorry 2 say that u r a fucker and a big and bad weight on net plz close this fucker bing.u fool dont u understand that v the public need a good responce.hope u understood.<br />
                                         yours bad record vitness<br />
                                                                    mrs ram sharma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j a hill</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-12374</link>
		<dc:creator>j a hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-12374</guid>
		<description>Bing search (etc.) is the most inefficient engine I have encountered - I hope it will move to someone else&#039;s computer or simply lose itself in it morass of search of ignorant search activities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing search (etc.) is the most inefficient engine I have encountered &#8211; I hope it will move to someone else&#8217;s computer or simply lose itself in it morass of search of ignorant search activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-11974</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-11974</guid>
		<description>I did a test to see which browser could help me find &quot;The chemical processes occuring within a living cell or organism that are necessary for the maintenance of life&quot;. Bing&#039;s link was: Organism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Google&#039;s was: metabolism: Definition from Answers.com. And it told me that I had misspelled &#039;occuring&#039; which is actually with two r&#039;s. Google rocks balls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a test to see which browser could help me find &#8220;The chemical processes occuring within a living cell or organism that are necessary for the maintenance of life&#8221;. Bing&#8217;s link was: Organism &#8211; Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Google&#8217;s was: metabolism: Definition from Answers.com. And it told me that I had misspelled &#8216;occuring&#8217; which is actually with two r&#8217;s. Google rocks balls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Lautner</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-11419</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Lautner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-11419</guid>
		<description>I use both Bing and Google search engine and i dont see much difference in their search results. I use google for searching hard to find academic topics and Bing for general search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use both Bing and Google search engine and i dont see much difference in their search results. I use google for searching hard to find academic topics and Bing for general search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kymm</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-10604</link>
		<dc:creator>Kymm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-10604</guid>
		<description>i think that Bing is not as good as Google.  Google would still index new websites faster than Bing. Microsoft would still need a lot of catching to do with GoogleBot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that Bing is not as good as Google.  Google would still index new websites faster than Bing. Microsoft would still need a lot of catching to do with GoogleBot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Blaze</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-9975</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Blaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-9975</guid>
		<description>for my IT class research project I compared the two and 70% +,- 5% of the time google gave more accurate/relevant results. (200 total)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for my IT class research project I compared the two and 70% +,- 5% of the time google gave more accurate/relevant results. (200 total)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
