<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Bing &#8211; Careless or Stupid?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/</link>
	<description>I think you are lost...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lola</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/#comment-20087</link>
		<dc:creator>lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-20087</guid>
		<description>Bing is stupid because it only focuses on movie stars and their problems.  There is more to life that TV and the movies, guys.  Get it through your engine programming heads.  There are still people out there who care about other issues besides dumb contemporary music, movies television and movie star problems.

Provide some some serious and readily accessible content for a change.  Allow the public to access content without having to search through all the garbage presented by your programmers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing is stupid because it only focuses on movie stars and their problems.  There is more to life that TV and the movies, guys.  Get it through your engine programming heads.  There are still people out there who care about other issues besides dumb contemporary music, movies television and movie star problems.</p>
<p>Provide some some serious and readily accessible content for a change.  Allow the public to access content without having to search through all the garbage presented by your programmers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Johnson</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/#comment-17804</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-17804</guid>
		<description>it is only a matter of time before Bing Microsoft acquires Yahoo search engine;;:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is only a matter of time before Bing Microsoft acquires Yahoo search engine;;:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KDB</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/#comment-17394</link>
		<dc:creator>KDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-17394</guid>
		<description>First comment in over a year. 
Here is why bing is still around; it’s is as simple and mindless as TV. This is not a search engine, this is a TV guide for people who don&#039;t really want to be bothered by knowing stuff. 
The pretty colorful front page cluttered with totally irreverent pictures tells you all you need to know. 
Google is a research tool and bing is how you find like restaurants an stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First comment in over a year.<br />
Here is why bing is still around; it’s is as simple and mindless as TV. This is not a search engine, this is a TV guide for people who don&#8217;t really want to be bothered by knowing stuff.<br />
The pretty colorful front page cluttered with totally irreverent pictures tells you all you need to know.<br />
Google is a research tool and bing is how you find like restaurants an stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark K</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/#comment-16999</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-16999</guid>
		<description>Stupid Bing - Trying to impress us with their fact checking

Engineering Wonders: The Roman Coliseum at El Djem

http://www.bing.com/featured/content/search?q=Engineering+Wonders%3a+The+Roman+Coliseum+at+El+Djem&amp;FORM=RQHOME

Bing&#039;s Fact:
The Roman coliseum at El Djem, Tunisia in northern Africa was built nearly 1,700 centuries ago...

1700 centuries = 170,000 years

Roman Kingdom founded 2,763 years ago
Roman Republic founded 2,519 years ago
Roman Empire founded 2,011 years ago

Wooly Mammoths and Neanderthal Man lived 29,000 to 230,000 years ago

So the Roman coliseum at El Djem, Tunisia was built 167,237 years before anything Roman or anything else in Tunisia.  The cavemen must of used the mammoth&#039;s to drag the stones around.  Amazing how they were able to build such a beaitful structure using such primitive tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid Bing &#8211; Trying to impress us with their fact checking</p>
<p>Engineering Wonders: The Roman Coliseum at El Djem</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bing.com/featured/content/search?q=Engineering+Wonders%3a+The+Roman+Coliseum+at+El+Djem&#038;FORM=RQHOME" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/featured/content/search?q=Engineering+Wonders%3a+The+Roman+Coliseum+at+El+Djem&#038;FORM=RQHOME</a></p>
<p>Bing&#8217;s Fact:<br />
The Roman coliseum at El Djem, Tunisia in northern Africa was built nearly 1,700 centuries ago&#8230;</p>
<p>1700 centuries = 170,000 years</p>
<p>Roman Kingdom founded 2,763 years ago<br />
Roman Republic founded 2,519 years ago<br />
Roman Empire founded 2,011 years ago</p>
<p>Wooly Mammoths and Neanderthal Man lived 29,000 to 230,000 years ago</p>
<p>So the Roman coliseum at El Djem, Tunisia was built 167,237 years before anything Roman or anything else in Tunisia.  The cavemen must of used the mammoth&#8217;s to drag the stones around.  Amazing how they were able to build such a beaitful structure using such primitive tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lacey Cook</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/#comment-14987</link>
		<dc:creator>Lacey Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 19:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-14987</guid>
		<description>It is interesting to compare the performance of  Bing and Google search but i haven&#039;t seen any difference at all in their performance.   .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to compare the performance of  Bing and Google search but i haven&#8217;t seen any difference at all in their performance.   .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/#comment-14770</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-14770</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m sorry, but i&#039;ve given bing a couple of days now.  and typically microsoft, it&#039;s not what it says on the tin.  with around 50% of searches i get the EXACT same results as google, not &#039;more relavent&#039; results.  with the other 50% i get i would honestly say &#039;less relavent&#039; results.  and the picture behind the whole page makes it load slowly on anything but my fast broadband at home.  back to google me thinks, sorry microsoft.  how about stop making game consoles (that don&#039;t work) and search engines (that don&#039;t work like you say it does) and concentrate more on your &#039;bread &amp; butter&#039; - windows.  then maybe we&#039;ll get a proper good OS for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m sorry, but i&#8217;ve given bing a couple of days now.  and typically microsoft, it&#8217;s not what it says on the tin.  with around 50% of searches i get the EXACT same results as google, not &#8216;more relavent&#8217; results.  with the other 50% i get i would honestly say &#8216;less relavent&#8217; results.  and the picture behind the whole page makes it load slowly on anything but my fast broadband at home.  back to google me thinks, sorry microsoft.  how about stop making game consoles (that don&#8217;t work) and search engines (that don&#8217;t work like you say it does) and concentrate more on your &#8216;bread &amp; butter&#8217; &#8211; windows.  then maybe we&#8217;ll get a proper good OS for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly Martin</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/#comment-14691</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-14691</guid>
		<description>I use Bing and Google whenever i want to find something on the internet. I think that both search engines are very good.         `</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Bing and Google whenever i want to find something on the internet. I think that both search engines are very good.         `</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ram</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/#comment-13641</link>
		<dc:creator>ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 19:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-13641</guid>
		<description>www.bing.com i am sorry 2 say that u r a fucker and a big and bad weight on net plz close this fucker bing.u fool dont u understand that v the public need a good responce.hope u understood.
                                         yours bad record vitness
                                                                    mrs ram sharma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com</a> i am sorry 2 say that u r a fucker and a big and bad weight on net plz close this fucker bing.u fool dont u understand that v the public need a good responce.hope u understood.<br />
                                         yours bad record vitness<br />
                                                                    mrs ram sharma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j a hill</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/#comment-12374</link>
		<dc:creator>j a hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-12374</guid>
		<description>Bing search (etc.) is the most inefficient engine I have encountered - I hope it will move to someone else&#039;s computer or simply lose itself in it morass of search of ignorant search activities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing search (etc.) is the most inefficient engine I have encountered &#8211; I hope it will move to someone else&#8217;s computer or simply lose itself in it morass of search of ignorant search activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://vinhboy.com/blog/2009/05/30/microsoft-bing-careless-or-stupid/#comment-11974</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinhboy.com/?p=552#comment-11974</guid>
		<description>I did a test to see which browser could help me find &quot;The chemical processes occuring within a living cell or organism that are necessary for the maintenance of life&quot;. Bing&#039;s link was: Organism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Google&#039;s was: metabolism: Definition from Answers.com. And it told me that I had misspelled &#039;occuring&#039; which is actually with two r&#039;s. Google rocks balls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a test to see which browser could help me find &#8220;The chemical processes occuring within a living cell or organism that are necessary for the maintenance of life&#8221;. Bing&#8217;s link was: Organism &#8211; Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Google&#8217;s was: metabolism: Definition from Answers.com. And it told me that I had misspelled &#8216;occuring&#8217; which is actually with two r&#8217;s. Google rocks balls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

